4.11.2014
The Playground
Whilst looking through the list of different thrillers, 'The Playground' stood out to me straight away. When I first saw it I wasn't quite sure what it would be about, or how the people who created it would be able to turn a place that children go to have fun into something dark and sinister, in order to portray that the film will be a thriller.
When began watching it, I believed that the young girl with the long hair, the central image, was just a normal girl playing at the park. It wasn't until towards the end when the other family didn't notice her, and she kept on moving from place to place, that I began to understand the idea, I believe, that she was meant to be a ghost. Looking back I can now see that even from the point where the swing is swinging with no on one it, to then another shot of her siting upon it, that this was meant to bring about the illusion of her being a ghost.
After watching this opening sequence I can make a guess that the rest of the film may follow the story of the girl in the play park. We may even find out what happened to that girl, and why she stays in the playground. Directly after the sequence cuts out, I am left with the impression that something may happen to the little boy and his family that are also in the playground, but quite what, I'm not too sure.
The casting within this sequence I believe is very effective. The decision of using a girl with long hair helped to create an eerie atmosphere, as her hair was always covering her face. The long hair also made her seem a lot younger than what the actress probably was. The use of the very young boy, innocence, gave the impression that something bad was going to happen. This built suspense because people watching it really don't want to watch something that is so innocent and having fun get hurt. With the casting I don't believe that there was anything particularly interesting about the character chosen. the casting of the family just made them seem like a normal family, the only thing that I thought stood out, as i mentioned before, was the length of the girls hair.
There is very little dialogue used withing the scene, along with the non-diegetic music in the background, there is also diegetic sound of the family talking to one another whilst they play in the park. The 'ghost' girl never makes any noise, thus giving her a very eerie sense. The sound of the young boy laughing, juxaposes the connotations of the music (that something bad is to happen) The whole thing appears to have been shot on location at a playpark, this gives it a much more realistic atmpsoshere then if they would have done it in a studio. I believe that they were very lucky with the weather that they had that day, if it had been sunny day, it wouldn't have given quite the same atmosphere. Considering that they were working outside and didn't have control of lighting, and couldn't desgin an exact set that they wanted to work with, you wouldnt be able to tell, as everything appears to have worked out how they wanted it to, with the right lighting and a good location on the day of shooting.
They managed to fit in a whole lot of different camera angles and different edits into quite a short sequence. The use of POV shots, when the girl were looking at the family, were very effective as when there was a wide shot afterwards the girl had dissappered. She could see the people but they had no idea that she was there. I really liked the idea that they contantly changed between the family's hand held camera, filming the little boy, and the main camera filming the whole sequence. With the main camera we could see the girl, but on the hand held she wasn't there. We are following the story of the young boy on the hand held, and I beleive that it would have worked well, if afterwards something bad happened to the family. i think that the video camera could then be a central point to the rest of the movie, as the scenario that unfolds afterwards could be caught on tape and used as evidence.
The use of credits within the scene I believe is very effective as they are rather small and in the far corners of the sequence, therefore they don't stand out too much and we are still able to focus on what is going on in the rest of the scene. The font is very simplistic, whilst editing they haven't attempted to do anything too over the top, I find that they made the right choice to do this as what they have chosen to use works very well within the scene. As we are trying to work out what is going on within the sequence we don't want anything that is going to distract us.
Once watching the entire sequence I was left really wanting to know what was going to happen next, they ended it very vauguely, not giving too much away I suppose with the intention, as they have managed to do with me, to make people want to know how the rest of the movie will unfold. I think that they way they have presented the film within the opening title sequence, I don't think that it would be that big of a budget film, for me I think that they were attempting to go for a more horror type genre, but it is hard to tell as the clip that i watched really doesn't give anything away really. I personally would pay to go and watch this film in the cinema but i think that it would be with and independent company, I think it would be more likely for it to go straight to DVD as they may not have the buget to organise it to be displayed in cinemas.